We have SCO's Redacted Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [PDF], and exhibits. A whole lot of rearguing going on, from what I see in a quick glance. They argue again that Novell isn't entitled to any royalties from UnixWare licenses that also license SVRX incidentally. And there is a change in the room for the trial starting September 17, from Judge Kimball's courtroom to Judge Dee Benson's, Room 246.
They don't say why, but maybe they expect too many people? Or fewer, now that there is no jury, now that I think of it. Anyway, whatever the reason, here's PACER:
460 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE of Courtroom Change for Trial by Novell, Inc. (Sneddon, Heather)461 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Notice of Conventional Filing
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of SCOS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURTS AUGUST 10, 2007 ORDER filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re [458] Sealed Document, (Normand, Edward)462 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages
Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages re SCOS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURTS AUGUST 10, 2007 ORDER filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward)463 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Redacted Document
Docket Text: REDACTION to [461] Notice of Conventional Filing re SCOS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURTS AUGUST 10, 2007 ORDER by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 # (2) Exhibit 2: Filed Under Seal# (3) Exhibit 3 # (4) Exhibit 4)(Normand, Edward)