There is a scheduling order now, providing deadlines for IBM to answer SCO's Motion to Compel IBM to Produce Sam Palmisano for Deposition. IBM's memo in opposition is due February 11, and then SCO has until March 4 to respond. Also, the order gives SCO until February 25 to file its Reply Memorandum in Support of its Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery.
************************
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
Alan L. Sullivan (3152)
Todd M. Shaughnessy (6651)
Amy F. Sorenson (8947)
[address]
[phone]
[fax]
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
Evan R. Chesler (admitted pro hac vice)
David R. Marriott (7572)
[address]
[phone]
[fax]
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff
International Business Machines Corporation
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
THE SCO GROUP, INC., |
ORDER RE BRIEFING FOR PENDING MOTIONS Civil No. 2:03CV-0294 DAK Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells |
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
IBM's Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Motion to Compel IBM to Produce Samuel Palmisano for Deposition shall be due on February 11, 2005;
SCO's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery shall be due on February 25, 2005; and
SCO's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel IBM to Produce Samuel Palmisano for Deposition shall be due on March 4, 2005.
DATED this 28th day of January, 2005.
BY THE COURT
___[signature]___
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James
By:__[signature]___
Counsel for Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 28th day of January, 2005, a true and correct copies of the foregoing was and was sent by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to the following:
Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James
HATCH JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
[address]Stephen N. Zack
Mark J. Heise
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address]Robert Silver, Esq.
Edward Normand
Sean Eskovitz
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address]
___[signature]___
Amy F. Sorenson