| IBM Says No Problem - SCO Can Amend Their Complaint |
| Friday, February 20 2004 @ 04:25 PM EST |
|
IBM yesterday filed a Memorandum in Response to SCO's Motion to File Amended Pleadings. I would rename it IBM's "Go Ahead, Make My Day" Memorandum. In it they tell the judge that they don't mind a bit if SCO would like to amend their pleadings, dropping the trade secret claims and substituting the copyright infringement based on SCO's serfdom "legal theory" of derivative code. (Thanks to Groklaw reader LionKuntz for the serfdom analogy.) They will answer, if the judge allows SCO's amended complaint, and they will tell all the reasons why they believe SCO's claims are without merit, and personally I am looking forward to that document. Again, it is very clear, IBM is in no hurry to bring this to any early end based on a technicality. They seem to want to get a ruling on the merits that will be a precedent and stand the test of time. The PDF is here. Also, Kevin McBride is moving to sunny California. Maybe it's too hot in Utah? Joke. Joke. Actually, it's too icy. Notice of his new address is here.
SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P.
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff ____________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ____________________________ THE SCO GROUP, INC. Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. ____________________________
MEMORANDUM OF Civil No. 2:03CV0294 DAK
Honorable Dale A. Kimball __________________________ Pursuant to DUCivR 7-1(b)(3), Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") submits the following response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Pleadings filed on February 4, 2004. As will be set out in IBM's answer to plaintiff's proposed Second Amended Complaint -- should the Court permit plaintiff to file it -- plaintiff's amended allegations are meritless. Nevertheless, and without conceding the grounds on which the amended pleadings are based, IBM does not oppose plaintiff's second motion for leave to amend, subject to IBM's right to move against the amended pleadings. DATED this 19th day of February, 2004. SNELL & WILMER, LLP _______[signature]____________
Alan L. Sullivan
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE L.L.P.
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Of counsel:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 19th day of February, 2004, a true and correct copy of the foregoing MEMORANDUM OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF IBM IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS was hand delivered to the following:
Brent O. Hatch
Kevin P. McBride and sent by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to the following:
Stephen N. Zack __________signature_________
***************************************************
Kevin P. McBride (4494) Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ____________________________
THE SCO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Defendant. ____________________________
NOTICE OF CHANGE Case No. 03-CV-0294
US District Judge: Dale A. Kimball ____________________________ Kevin P. McBride, co-counsel for plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby gives notice of change of address. Please serve all further pleadings in this matter to the following:
Kevin P. McBride DATED this 10th day of February 2004.
___________[signed]_____________ The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of Notice of Change of Address was served on Defendant International Business Machines Corporation on this 11 day of February 2004, by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid to:
Alan L. Sullivan
Evan R. Chesler
Donald J. Rosenberg
|
|
||||